Convincing Proof of God’s Existence
I used to be a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist back in 2012. I was a practitioner of Scientism – the philosophical belief that science and the scientific method is the ONLY way to find and know the truth. I also believed that Natural Selection could do what they say it does. I simply knew that Natural Selection exists and that its effects are real. I had bought into the party line.
At the time, I interacted with Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists online. I considered them kindred spirits. They were like me. I felt as if I were a part of them. They were my people.
One of my atheistic friends told me that there is NO scientific proof of God’s existence and that there will NEVER be any scientific proof of God’s existence. I believed him. I’d never found any convincing proof of God’s existence. I figured that God’s existence had to be taken on blind faith as being real and true. That is what the Atheists teach.
But one has to consider the messenger in order to truly understand the message.
We defined “science” as Materialism, Physicalism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism. Obviously, Atheism, Naturalism, or “science” will never prove to anyone that God exists. Science defined as Materialism, Naturalism, and Atheism defines God out of existence, a priori, by definition and in principle.
We were RIGHT! Science as we defined “science” would NEVER produce any scientific proof of God’s existence.
How you choose to define things makes all the difference in the world! It’s a choice! And, our choices have consequences whether we realize it or not. Our beliefs are chosen into existence.
Shifting One’s Perspective
Now, consider what happens when we choose to define “science” as Fine-Tuning.
Science is Fine-Tuning.
Wow!
Instantly, we are looking at thousands if not millions of different Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence. Each ACT of Fine-Tuning or Science is a miniature scientific proof of God’s existence.
Examine the following syllogism. It’s a Philosophical Proof of God’s Existence. Because it’s a syllogism, if the premises are true, then the conclusion has to be true as well.
Scientific Observation or Premise: Anything that was obviously fine-tuned obviously had a Fine-Tuner who fine-tuned it.
Scientific Observations: A genome was obviously fine-tuned. A protein and a gene were obviously fine-tuned with a specific purpose in mind. Our physical universe and the physical constants were obviously fine-tuned. Your computer and your car were obviously fine-tuned. This computer program that I’m using was obviously fine-tuned. Your physical body was clearly fine-tuned for specific purposes. The neurotransmitters within your brain were clearly and obviously fine-tuned. It’s undeniable.
Scientific Conclusion: ALL of these things were obviously fine-tuned which means that they obviously have a Fine-Tuner who fine-tuned them.
If you choose to define Science as Fine-Tuning, then instantly this syllogism and philosophical proof of God becomes a convincing, valid, solid, and sound Scientific Proof of God’s Existence.
Instantly, we have Scientific Proof of God’s Existence; and, it happens automatically by choosing to define Science as Fine-Tuning rather than choosing to define science as Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism.
Do you see how that works?
It works wonderfully, but only if you choose to allow it to work. It’s a choice! Our beliefs are chosen into existence.
However, if you continue to define science as Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism, then you will NEVER have any scientific proof of God’s existence. That’s just the way things work.
There’s no compelling reason to define science as Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism. These things are not the best explanation, anyway. I mean think about it! Who did ALL of that Fine-Tuning or Science BEFORE we human beings arrived on the scene?
When we are talking about the physical constants, this physical universe, and physical matter, we are talking about a Fine-Tuner who was doing Science or Fine-Tuning BEFORE this physical universe began. That’s the very definition of a God, is it not?
By choosing to define Science as Fine-Tuning, instantly we have compelling and believable and convincing Scientific Proof of God’s Existence. That’s one of the reasons why I go overboard trying to define everything and compare everything. I learn best and learn most through comparison and contrast.
Mark My Words
—
Source
Scientific Proof of God’s Existence: Finding God Where the Atheists Refuse to Look for Him